As I wrote here, one last important step remained: lowering the hood. Ford Motor Company was the first of Detroit's "Big Three" carmakers to take this step across its entire brand portfolio. (Studebakers's redesigned 1947 line had fairly low hoods, but not as low as Ford's designs. The redesigned 1952 Nash's hoods were lower than the nearby fenders, but Nash was not a major carmaker. See the first link above for more examples.)
Ford stylists and consulting stylists created the redesigned 1952 line with all the key post-evolution features in place. Fenderlines were high and simple. Hoods were not much higher than the fenders. The overall design was what was later called "three-box," with a somewhat angular passenger compartment greenhouse and a bustleback trunk echoing the hood up front. In this post, I presented a walkaround of a 1952 Mercury.
The present post compares four-door sedans for the Ford, Mercury and Lincoln brands. Ford and Mercury shared the same basic body, though Mercury's wheelbase was three inches (76 mm) longer. Higher-priced, lower production Lincolns used a different body. This lack of body-sharing with another brand was not an economical practice. General Motors' high price Cadillac brand shared bodies with some Buick and even Oldsmobile models in those days.
Unless noted, images below are of cars listed for sale.
To me, the '49 Ford epitomizes the end of the evolutionary period. The next-generation Ford Motor Company line's styling was a refinement of this.
A major competitor with a tall hood and lower fenders.
Ford's 1949 Mercury and Lincoln designs also had tall hoods because their design themes were set before the 1949 Ford was created.
This model was Ford's best-seller for 1952. Details included "frenched" headlight assemblies, a one-piece curved windshield, and side sculpting suggestive of an air intake (to provide visual relief from what otherwise would be plain sides).
Mercurys used the same side sculpting, but the fake air intake is more believable. Plus, the hood also sports a fake air scoop. Like Ford, headlight assembles are "frenched" to create a little more fender length.
I couldn't find some suitable views of 1952 Lincoln four-door sedans. But 1953 models were almost identical. Even though the body is different from Ford and Mercury, the basic theme is the same. Including the fake fender air intake feature. Headlights are not frenched, however.
Rear fenders terminate in round taillight housings that further lengthen the fenderline. The backlight window is panoramic, and one-piece. Rear license plates covered a central fuel door, a convenience feature stressed in Ford advertising.
Mercury tail light assemblies leaned forwards, not contributing to an extended fenderline.
For some reason Lincoln's backlight was three-piece.
Now for side views that are best for showing structural comparisons.
Mercury's greater length was created forward of the cowling and front door leading edge cutline. Aside from chrome trim, front wheel openings, and different tail light assemblies, the Ford and Mercury sedans are structurally the same.
Lower-body door cut lines are similar to Ford's and Mercury's, so it's possible that the Lincoln body shared some of their structure.
2 comments:
If you had included a 1949 Plymouth you could see that the Chevy was halfway between the Plymouth and Ford in getting away from prewar designs in about every way. Plymouth four door models even have the back seat arm rest on the body instead of the door.
In some car museum I once saw the Chevy displayed parked next to the Ford. The more modern rounded in plan view body of Ford was obvious. The one thing that makes the Ford look old is the flat planes windshield, no doubt a cost and production directive since the Lincoln Cosmo had a one piece curved one. Other than that it's pretty much the prototype for all sedans since then.
It's odd that after the Cosmo being so different from Fords in 1952 they became clearly visually similar, yet the Lincoln isn't really the same anywhere. You could say the same for a Cadillac vs an upper model Buick, but that wasn't the Chevy related body and the GM managed to differentiate the two. There must be a lot in common under the skin of all the FoMoCo cars, but still they could have done more with the Lincoln. They got back on the program with the still spectacular 1956 model.
The 1955-56 Mercury has some similarities with the structure of the 1949-52 cars.
Post a Comment