I suppose that someplace out there is a definitive discussion of the 1952-to-1953 transition. But all I seem to read has it that either (1) the bodies were new, or (2) they were some sort of facelift.
When all else fails, as it seems, I resort to photos to try to make a case, and I'll flesh that out in the captions below.
First, a few items: I compare 1953 Chevys and Pontiacs to some 1952 Oldsmobiles and Buicks for reasons that will become apparent. Chevrolet wheelbases remained constant over the 1952-53 transition at 115 inches (2921 mm). Pontiac's grew from 120 inches (3048 mm) to 122 inches (3099 mm). The 1952 Buick Special shown below had a 121.5 inch (3086 mm) wheelbase. The Oldsmobile Supper 88s wheelbase was 119.5 (3035) and the Ninety-Eight's was 124 inches (3150 mm). Unless noted, the images are of cars listed for sale.
1952 Pontiac Chieftain 2-door sedan, Mecum auctions photo. Chevrolet 2-door sedans were similar, though had shorter hoods. Both brands' General Motors A-bodies had two-piece windshields 1949-52.
1952 Buick Special 2-door sedan. This is a GM B-body introduced for the 1950 model year. Windshields were one-piece.
The restyled 1953 Pontiac Chieftain 2-door sedan. Its passenger compartment "greenhouse" is essentially identical to the '52 Buick Special's including the one-piece windshield. The C-pillars on the Pontiac are slightly thinner, but all else looks the same. However, the fender design is a carryover of the 1949-52 theme, the actual shaping having changed a little.
1953 Chevrolet Bel Air 2-door sedan, Barrett-Jackson photo. The greenhouse is the same as the Pontiac's, but the rest of the car is stubbier.
1952 Pontiac Chieftain 4-door sedan.
1952 Chevrolet Styleline Deluxe 4-door sedan. Again, these are from the final year of the 1949-52 A-body.
1952 Oldsmobile Super 88 4-door sedan, Barrett-Jackson photo.
1952 Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight 4-door sedan, factory photo. These two images show examples of 1952 B-body 4-door sedans on cars with different wheelbases. The greenhouses are the same, but the 98's chrome trim around the C-pillar makes them seem a bit different.
1953 Pontiac Chieftain 4-door sedan, factory photo. Again, the Pontiac '53 A-body greenhouse is virtually the same as that of the '52 four-door B-body's. The difference is that the Pontiac rear door is not as wide as those on those Olds's.
1953 Chevrolet Bel Air 4-door sedan, Mecum photo. The same applies to the '53 Chevy 4-door sedan.
My conclusion is that General Motors used the core elements of its 1950-53 B-bodies as the basis for the "redesigned" 1953-54 A-bodies. The passenger compartment was the most costly to engineer, so by keeping it the same aside from minor C-pillar differences, the A-bodies were comparatively cheap to develop. This might have been motivated by the knowledge that a totally redesigned A-body would definitely be coming on-line for 1955 or maybe even as early as 1954, so a large expense to freshen 1952 Chevies and Pontiacs didn't seem worth doing, even for the wealthy corporation that GM was in those days.
2 comments:
I agree, most likely it would have been due to all of the r&r that GM would have been pouring into the brand new for '55 Chev and the Cheif. As a vintage Chevrolet/GM admirer of the 1949-54 era, I have to admit that I do like the overall styling of the '52 better.
Overall, the 1953 Pontiac and Chevy is a far better design than the 1949-1952, which, comparitively, looks dated and bulbous ..
The two-door C-pillar Design and rear window on the '53 looks far better and gives the cars a sleeker look. It also gives the rear seat a better, more airy feel ..
The 4 doors on the other hand look "unfinished" -- like they were tacked on mid-stream .. the Squared off door window frame doesn't look right compared to the sweeping C Pillar .. Chevy did slightly better with the chrome trim 'hide' and lack of vent window - the Pontiac looks terrible ..
Post a Comment